GST

Fake Invoices in Scrap Trade: How GST Officers Track Them and Why Honest Buyers Pay the Price

By CA Shashank K. S. Raikar · · 10 min read

If you buy or sell MS scrap, non-ferrous scrap, plastic scrap, or any commodity where goods are routinely sourced from small, unregistered collectors, this one is for you.

Over the last eighteen months or so, I’ve reviewed more than a dozen notices in this space, some issued to my own clients, some forwarded to me for a second opinion by fellow practitioners. The pattern is consistent, and the enforcement is getting noticeably sharper. What used to take weeks of paperwork is now pieced together from RFID data, weighbridge slips, and a driver’s statement, often within 48 hours of the truck being stopped.

The uncomfortable part is that even a completely honest buyer can get caught in the net when the supplier turns out to be a shell entity. That’s the bit I want you to take seriously.

Here’s what you’ll take away:

Why the scrap trade is a magnet for this

Fake-invoice rackets flourish where three conditions sit together: a large unorganised supply base, a high tax rate, and quick turnover. The scrap trade ticks all three.

Most of the raw material is collected from kabadiwalas, demolition sites, end consumers, and small industrial units. Almost none of them issue tax invoices. A registered dealer who buys from them has two clean options. He can purchase under proper records and discharge tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism where applicable, or he can buy from another registered dealer who has already taken the goods into his books.

Some operators take a third route, which is illegal. They float a shell GST registration using a fake rent agreement and a forged electricity bill, issue tax invoices for “supplies” that never actually happened in their premises, and pass on Input Tax Credit down the chain. The buyer takes ITC. The shell supplier never discharges tax in cash. Eventually, and it really is eventually at this point rather than “if”, the racket gets busted, and the buyer is left holding the bag.

How officers actually track these cases

Let me ground this in something real. I recently went through a Section 130 notice issued to a supplier who had shipped scrap into Goa. The invoice and e-way bill said the goods had moved from Hubballi. The driver, on being stopped near Kumta, told the officer quite plainly that he had actually loaded the truck in Udupi. Within hours, the department had RFID toll data, weighbridge slips from an Udupi weighbridge, and physical toll receipts all pointing to Udupi as the real origin. A field visit at the declared Hubballi address found a residential building whose owner denied ever renting it to the supplier and called the rent agreement fabricated. The consignment was a little over ₹7.5 lakh, and the entire case was stitched together in under two days.

If you still believe that a clean invoice, a valid e-way bill, and a filed GSTR-1 place a transaction beyond challenge, that case alone should change your mind. Here is the toolkit now in regular use:

1. RFID and FASTag toll data

Every e-way bill is linked to the vehicle number. Officers can pull up the vehicle’s toll passage history and match it against the declared route. If the invoice says “dispatched from Hubballi” but the truck crossed tolls near Udupi the previous evening, the story collapses before the driver steps out of the cabin.

2. Weighbridge slips from the actual loading point

Drivers keep weighbridge slips for diesel reconciliation and for the owner’s records. Each slip carries the weighbridge’s address. A slip from Udupi against an invoice from Hubballi is a direct, documentary contradiction, and there is simply no innocent way to explain it.

3. The driver’s statement

Drivers are the weakest link in a paper-only transaction. Ask a driver plainly where he loaded the goods, and most will tell the truth. Once the statement is recorded, signed, and countersigned, it becomes primary evidence. Very hard to walk back later.

4. Physical verification of the supplier’s premises

Where doubts arise, the enforcement wing in the supplier’s jurisdiction is asked to visit the principal place of business. If the address turns out to be a residential flat with no scrap storage, or worse, if the landlord denies renting the premises and calls the rent agreement fabricated, the supplier is declared non-existent. Registration is then liable to be cancelled, usually with retrospective effect.

5. GST portal cross-checks

Officers verify whether the supplier has declared any additional place of business in the area from which the goods were actually loaded. If no APOB is declared, the movement itself is in contravention of the law, regardless of how clean the invoice looks.

6. Bank trail analysis

Cash payments, informal channels, and circular routing (A pays B, B pays C, C pays back to A) are immediate red flags. So are supplier bank accounts that receive money from dozens of parties and sweep it out the same day to a single account.

7. Return-data analytics

A supplier whose GSTR-1 shows large outward supplies but whose GSTR-3B shows negligible cash tax (because everything is adjusted against questionable ITC) gets flagged automatically. So do entities with unusually high ITC-to-output-tax ratios in scrap and other high-risk HSNs.

Any one of these checks, on its own, has gaps. Stitched together, they produce a very tight evidence chain.

The part most buyers underestimate

Here’s the piece I find many traders don’t fully appreciate. When a supplier is declared non-existent or bogus, the fallout doesn’t stop at his door.

I’ll put it bluntly. The shell supplier may or may not be traceable after the fact. The genuine buyer, with a known address, a clean balance sheet, and real money in the bank, is the easier target for recovery. That isn’t fair, but it is the practical reality, and your documentation has to be built with this reality in mind. In the notices I’ve reviewed, the ITC amounts at stake have typically run between ₹5 lakh and ₹50 lakh, and in two cases well above that.

Eight safeguards every scrap buyer should put in place

You can’t entirely eliminate the risk of buying from a bad supplier. But you can make it very hard for the department to allege that you were complicit or negligent. Here’s the checklist I routinely recommend to clients:

  1. Do real KYC on every new supplier. Not just GSTIN and PAN. Visit or video-call the premises, photograph the stockyard and signboard, and collect a recent utility bill in the registered name.

  2. Read the supplier’s GST profile carefully. Date of registration, declared principal and additional places of business, return filing track record, and any cancellation or suspension history. A supplier registered two months ago, sitting at a residential address, with no APOB in the state where the goods are supposedly stored, deserves a second look.

  3. Insist on e-invoice wherever the supplier is covered. An e-invoice with a valid IRN is much harder to fabricate than a plain tax invoice.

  4. Match goods movement to declared premises. If the invoice is from Hubballi but the driver tells you the truck is being loaded in Udupi, walk away from that consignment. Confirm the loading address before dispatch, and make sure it’s either the principal place of business or a properly declared APOB.

  5. Keep independent evidence of delivery. Weighbridge slip at your end, unloading photos with date-time stamp, gate inward register, transporter’s LR, and CCTV footage where available. This is your most valuable asset if a notice ever lands.

  6. Pay only through banking channels, and only into the supplier’s declared account. Cross-check that the account holder name matches the registered legal name on the GST portal.

  7. Reconcile GSTR-2B every month, without exception. A supplier who repeatedly fails to reflect your invoices, or files well after the due date, is an early warning. Recurring mismatches over two or three months are usually the earliest red flag of a problematic supplier. Exit before the department does it for you.

  8. Be suspicious of rates that look too good. If a supplier is consistently 4 to 5% below the market rate, ask yourself why. More often than not, the answer lies somewhere in tax arbitrage up the chain, not in genuine efficiency.

If a notice has already landed

Don’t panic, but don’t delay either.

Key takeaways


This post is written for general awareness and shouldn’t be read as legal or tax advice on any specific transaction. Section numbers, rates, and procedures referenced here are as currently in force, and readers should verify the latest position before acting.

GST Scrap Trade Fake Invoices ITC Section 130 Compliance GSTR-2B

Need help with GST compliance?

We serve 100+ MSME clients across Goa. Let's talk about your requirements.

WhatsApp Us →
← All Posts